It has been one month and 10 days since Charlie Kirk’s assassination, and we still know nothing factual about it.
The information or disinformation that has come out is nonsensical. Andrew Kolvet, a spokesman for Turning Point USA and executive producer of The Charlie Kirk Show, said the doctor who examined Kirk told him that there was no exit wound. Yet, we are told that the bullet was fired from a 30-06 rifle used by the suspect Tyler Robinson. This is an impossibility. A 30-06 would have left little of Kirk’s neck or head. It is ammunition used for grizzly bear and moose.
There is no evidence that any media or FBI questioned the attending doctor concerning his report of no exit wound as reported by Kolvet.
An internet search reports that no bullet has been found. A suggestion is offered that perhaps it has been recovered but the news is being withheld “possibly due to ongoing forensic processing or investigative sensitivity.” After 40 days they are still examining a bullet? The only possible thing that could be sensitive about the bullet, if they have it, is it is not 30-06 caliber.
The bullet that blew out the back of President Kennedy’s skull and managed to continue its magical path and cause three more wounds was allegedly found intact on the floor of President Kennedy’s limousine. It was a less powerful caliber than the alleged 30-06 used to murder Kirk. The explanation handed to us dumbshit insouciant Americans is that Kirk was so strong that the bullet fragmented and does not exist.
So what evidence do they have on which to try the suspect, Tyler Robinson? Theories of a fragmented bullet from a likely planted rifle with no evidence that the bullet that killed Kirk was ever fired from the rifle? Anyone can put an empty case in the receiver of a rifle or fire into the air or ground and not eject the case.
Other reports said the doctor attending to Kirk said that he found the bullet under Kirk’s neck skin. This cannot be correct if the bullet was a powerful 30-06. As far as available information goes, no one in the media or FBI has asked the doctor for the bullet or even inquired if he found it.
Among these astonishing investigatory failures, no one, not the FBI, not the media, has tracked down and questioned the clearly indicated man in brown whose movements and behavior suggest he might have been the murderer and who, according to an available video assuming it is not an AI creation, supervised the loading of Kirk’s body into a private vehicle and departed with it.
The media customarily dismisses any departure from the official narrative as a conspiracy theory and ignores it. Therefore, those who intend to deceive us have a free hand.
Kash Patel, on whom so many Americans rested their hopes for a return of a truthful and honest FBI, owes us explanations. He needs to tell us whether they have the bullet and if not why not. He needs to tell us if there is an exit wound and if not, why not. He needs to tell us who the man in brown is and whether he has been questioned and whether the video evidence of him directing Kirk’s body into a private vehicle and driving off with it is valid. He needs to tell us how Tyler Robinson hid the murder weapon in the nearby woods when he jumped down from the roof with no rifle in his possession.
Many have concluded that the man in brown was an Israeli agent who killed Kirk because Kirk had begun leading the rising American generation to question, rather than to worship, Israel. The absence of a professional investigation and objective reporting of Kirk’s assassination supports the belief that the Trump regime is covering up Israel’s murder of Charlie Kirk.
Reprinted with permission from PaulCraigRoberts.org.
