Jennifer Rubin, one of Washington Post’s neoconservative gate-keepers, is still trying to obfuscate the real issue behind what happened in Benghazi in 2011. Over the weekend, Rubin wrote:
“The biggest scandal regarding Benghazi may be that the president was not at the helm on 9-11-2011 and was not directing the response to an attack.”
Yet, one must look beyond the superficial to locate the heart of what happened in Benghazi.
As Ron Paul pointed out: "there was little extremism in Libya before the US attack on that country in 2011."
Is that not an important piece to the story?